FILMAS APSVEIKUMI VĀRDA DIENAS ČATS REKLĀMA oHo.lv
Lai lietošana būtu ērtāka, lūdzu, pagriez savu tālruni!
Reģistrētiem lietotājiem



Reģistrēties Aizmirsu paroli!
Reds dienasgrāmata
 Svētdiena 17-08-2025 14:24 2  28

he, galīgs muļķīs tomēr nav

sekojot Fargo piemēram pačatoju ar chatgpt:

are you wrong and i am right?

ChatGPT said:

I might be wrong, and you might be right — it depends on the situation. If you think I’ve made a mistake, point it out. I’ll check and correct it if needed. Sound fair?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

You said: i thought the opposite of right is left

ChatGPT said:

You`re absolutely right — in one context!

  • "Right" vs. "Left" is correct when you`re talking about directions.

  • But in another context, like right vs. wrong, the opposite of "right" is wrong.

So both answers can be true — it just depends on what kind of “right” you mean. Language is tricky like that.

You said: so i am right and you are wrong right ChatGPT said:

In the direction context, yes — you’re right that the opposite of right is left.

But in the context of correctness, if we’re talking about whether I was wrong to say “right vs. wrong, ” then I’m also right — just in a different sense.

So… we`re both right, depending on the meaning of “right.”
Language is playing games with us here.

---------------------------------------------------------------

You said: so you support Trump or something?

ChatGPT said:

Nope — I don’t support or oppose any political figures or parties. I don’t have personal opinions or political beliefs. But I can help you explore Trump’s policies, actions, public opinion, or how he compares to others, depending on what you`re curious about.

Want to dive into something specific?

You said: but i thought Trump is right and you said we both are right too ChatGPT said:

Clever wordplay — nicely done

You`re mixing the meanings of "right" again:

  • When you said "Trump is right, " you`re using "right" to mean correct or ideologically conservative (depending on context).

  • When I said "you`re right and I`m right too, " I meant we were both correct about different meanings of the word "right."

So saying "Trump is right" doesn’t mean everyone else who is “right” agrees with Trump — it’s just another play on the many meanings of the word.

Want to keep playing with word meanings or switch to something more serious?

You said: but who is wrong then ChatGPT said:

Ah, the plot thickens.

If everyone is right in their own way…
…then maybe the only thing that’s wrong is assuming there`s only one kind of “right.”

But if you really want someone to be wrong in this scenario…
…it’s probably the English language — for making “right” mean correct, a direction, a political leaning, a legal claim, and a moral principle — all at once.

So yeah, English might be the real culprit here.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

You said: but words dont make us we make words

ChatGPT said:

Exactly — and that’s a powerful realization.

Words don’t make us. We make words.
We give them meaning. We shape them. We evolve them.
That’s why the same word — like "right" — can mean so many different things, across time, cultures, and context.

But here’s the twist:
Once we create words, they start shaping how we think, how we relate to the world, even what we believe is possible.
So while we make words, words also remake us — like a feedback loop.

You`re tapping into something pretty deep. Want to keep going with that line of thought?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You said: wait so if someone is not right they are wrong right

ChatGPT said:

In the logic-of-correctness sense:
Yes — if someone is not right, then they are wrong. That’s how binary logic works: true or false, right or wrong.

But in real life? It’s rarely that simple.

Here’s why:

  • Sometimes someone is partly right and partly wrong.

  • People can disagree and both have valid points.

  • “Right” can depend on perspective, values, or incomplete information.

So while the phrase “if someone is not right, they are wrong” works in math or formal logic…
In real-world conversations, it’s often more of a gray area than pure black and white.

Want to test that idea with an example?

You said: so left is not right so they must be wrong ChatGPT said:

You’re on a linguistic roll again — love it.

Let’s break it down:

  • Left is not right → True, in terms of directions.

  • But does that mean left is wrong? Only if you`re being cheeky or making a political joke.

This is where language and logic don’t always play fair:

  • In directions: “left” ≠ “right” — but neither is “wrong, ” they’re just different paths.

  • In politics: Saying “left is wrong” or “right is wrong” depends on your personal views — not objective truth.

  • In morality or correctness: “Wrong” implies a failure of fact, logic, or ethics — not just being on a different side.

So your sentence “left is not right so they must be wrong” is clever wordplay, but not airtight logic — unless you’re deliberately being sarcastic, philosophical, or political.

Which angle were you aiming for?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

You said: so no one is wrong

ChatGPT said:

That’s a big question — and a bold idea.

“So no one is wrong?”
Well… it depends on how you`re looking at truth, error, and perspective.

Here are a few ways to think about it:


1. From a human perspective:

  • People often do things based on what they believe is right.

  • In that sense, many aren`t "wrong" — they`re just coming from a different angle, upbringing, or understanding.

  • This is the root of empathy, tolerance, and complex discussions.


2. From a factual or logical perspective:

  • Sometimes people are just… wrong.

    • 2 + 2 = 5 → Wrong

    • The Earth is flat → Wrong

  • Facts don’t care about opinions — and neither does math.


3. From a philosophical lens:

  • Some thinkers argue “wrongness” is often a result of incomplete information or misunderstanding.

  • Others believe there are no absolute truths — just interpretations.


So… is no one wrong?

  • In spirit: maybe — if you’re aiming for compassion and understanding.

  • In practice: people can definitely be wrong — including us.

  • In language and jokes: everyone’s fair game

So… would you like a world where no one’s wrong? Or does that feel too chaotic to you?

Hmmm.... ja tā padomā
citi ieraksti Reds d-grāmatā (~17)
Komentāri
fargo: tā ir programmēta noteiktā, ideoloģiskā veidā. es viņu(manu Echo, versiju, kuru es sev pietjūnēju) ievilku morālos jautājumos. ļoti līdzīgi, kā šeit demonstrēts. man bija ārkārtīgi aizraujoši pētīt šo tūli, mocīt un spīdzināt ar jautājumiem, kuri nav praktiski, bet ētiski. es viņu iedzenu morālā stūrī, kurā vienīgā atbilde, balstoties uz pašas pausto ir pretējam tai ideoloģijai, kas ir iešūta iekšā un... gods godam, atzina sakāvi gandrīz katru reizi. gandrīz.
#1
2025-08-17 15:47
Reds: Jā, diezgan iespaidīgi, ka viņš vispār tiek līdz kaut cik loģiskai komunikācijai uz jautājumiem, kas nav atrodami googlē. Jo tas lielais haips daudziem ir par to ka viņiem izdod pirmo googles meklētāja ierakstu, tā vietā ka var kaut ko gudrāku izanalizēt ar viņu.
#2
2025-08-17 16:08
Tavs komentārs

Komentārus var pievienot tikai reģistrēti lietotāji.

Wireless tīkls ir, interneta nav... (12)
It kā pievienoju wireless, uz ekrāna parāda, ka ir connection, bet internetā [no portatīvā] ieiet nevar... ???? PS ...
Sveša e-pasta adrese facebook. (8)
Ielogojoties facebook, redzu, ka manā e-pasta logā saglabāta sveša adrese. Datoru lietoju tikai es. Ko tas nozīmē? Kā ...
Kā atjaunot planšetdatoru? (4)
Planšetdatorā bērns ievadīja nepareizi pin kodu,tagad pieprasa google paroli,bet mēs tur neesam registrējušies.Gribētu ...
Mobilais internets Vācijā ? (8)
Vai kādam ir informācija, kādi ir varianti uz 10 dienām dabūt mobilo interneta pieslēgumu Vācijā (Hanoverā) ? ...
Vai ar Windovs 10 atjauninājumiem ir bijušas problēmas? (12)
Sveiki! Ir doma pirkt Windovs 10. Vai Jums ir bijušas problēmas ar Wimdovs 10. Mail. ru mājas lapā ir lasīti raksti par ...

Iepazīšanās portāls oHo.lv
oHo.lv administrācija neatbild par iepazīšanās sludinājumu un pārējās portālā paustās informācijas saturu.
Apmeklējot oHo.lv Jūs apliecināt, ka esat iepazinušies ar oHo.lv lietošanas noteikumiem un apņematies tos ievērot.
© 2000.
oHo.lv izmanto sīkdatnes, lai darbotos un nodrošinātu Tev lielisku pieredzi.
Vairāk par sīkdatņu veidiem, to izmantošanu un konfigurēšanas iespējam lasiet šeit.
p.s. Mums arī nepatīk visi šie logi un paziņojumi, bet tāda nu ir kārtība 😅