FILMAS APSVEIKUMI VĀRDA DIENAS ČATS REKLĀMA oHo.lv
Lai lietošana būtu ērtāka, lūdzu, pagriez savu tālruni!
Reģistrētiem lietotājiem



Reģistrēties Aizmirsu paroli!

Dienasgrāmatas (blogi)

 fargo,  26-10-2013 18:51  5

What Christians Believe II

(Jo katrs, kas bauda pienu, ir taisnības vārda nepratējs, jo tas ir bērns. Bet pilngadīgiem pienākas cieta barība, tiem, kam ir piedzīvojumi un kam prāti vingrināti izšķirt labu un ļaunu.)

(Pāvils, Bībele)

C.S.Lewis

The Invasion

  • Very well then, atheism is too simple. And I will tell you another view
    that is also too simple. It is the view I call Christianity-and-water, the
    view which simply says there is a good God in Heaven and everything is all
    right-leaving out all the difficult and terrible doctrines about sin and
    hell and the devil, and the redemption. Both these are boys` philosophies.
  • It is no good asking for a simple religion. After all, real things are
    not simple. They look simple, but they are not. The table I am sitting at
    looks simple: but ask a scientist to tell you what it is really made of-all
    about the atoms and how the light waves rebound from them and hit my eye and
    what they do to the optic nerve and what it does to my brain-and, of course,
    you find that what we call "seeing a table" lands you in mysteries and
    complications which you can hardly get to the end of. A child saying a
    child`s prayer looks simple. And if you are content to stop there, well and
    good. But if you are not-and the modern world usually is not-if you want to
    go on and ask what is really happening- then you must be prepared for
    something difficult. If we ask for something more than simplicity, it is
    silly then to complain that the something more is not simple.
  • Very often, however, this silly procedure is adopted by people who are
    not silly, but who, consciously or unconsciously, want to destroy
    Christianity. Such people put up a version of Christianity suitable for a
    child of six and make that the object of their attack. When you try to
    explain the Christian doctrine as it is really held by an instructed adult,
    they then complain that you are making their heads turn round and that it is
    all too complicated and that if there really were a God they are sure He
    would have made "religion" simple, because simplicity is so beautiful, etc.
    You must be on your guard against these people for they will change their
    ground every minute and only waste your tune. Notice, too, their idea of God
    "making religion simple": as if "religion" were something God invented, and
    not His statement to us of certain quite unalterable facts about His own
    nature.
  • Besides being complicated, reality, in my experience, is usually odd.
    It is not neat, not obvious, not what you expect. For instance, when you
    have grasped that the earth and the other planets all go round the sun, you
    would naturally expect that all the planets were made to match-all at equal
    distances from each other, say, or distances that regularly increased, or
    all the same size, or else getting bigger or smaller as you go farther from
    the sun. In fact, you find no rhyme or reason (that we can see) about either
    the sizes or the distances; and some of them have one moon, one has four,
    one has two, some have none, and one has a ring.
  • Reality, in fact, is usually something you could not have guessed. That
    is one of the reasons I believe Christianity. It is a religion you could not
    have guessed. If it offered us just the kind of universe we had always
    expected, I should feel we were making it up. But, in fact, it is not the
    sort of thing anyone would have made up. It has just that queer twist about
    it that real things have. So let us leave behind all these boys`
    philosophies-these over-simple answers. The problem is not simple and the
    answer is not going to be simpler either.
  • What is the problem? A universe that contains much that is obviously
    bad and apparently meaningless, but containing creatures like ourselves who
    know that it is bad and meaningless. There are only two views that face all
    the facts. One is the Christian view that this is a good world that has gone
    wrong, but still retains the memory of what it ought to have been. The other
    is the view called Dualism. Dualism means the belief that there are two
    equal and independent powers at the back of everything, one of them good and
    the other bad, and that this universe is the battlefield in which they fight
    out an endless war. I personally think that next to Christianity Dualism is
    the manliest and most sensible creed on the market. But it has a catch in
    it.
  • The two powers, or spirits, or gods-the good one and the bad one-are
    supposed to be quite independent. They both existed from all eternity.
    Neither of them made the other, neither of them has any more right than the
    other to call itself God. Each presumably thinks it is good and thinks the
    other bad. One of them likes hatred and cruelty, the other likes love and
    mercy, and each backs its own view. Now what do we mean when we call one of
    them the Good Power and the other the Bad Power? Either we are merely saying
    that we happen to prefer the one to the other-like preferring beer to
    cider-or else we are saying that, whatever the two powers think about it,
    and whichever we humans, at the moment,, happen to like, one of them is
    actually wrong, actually mistaken, in regarding itself as good. Now it we
    mean merely that we happen to prefer the first, then we must give up talking
    about good and evil at all. For good means what you ought to prefer quite
    regardless of what you happen to like at any given moment. If "being good"
    meant simply joining the side you happened to fancy, for no real reason,
    then good would not deserve to be called good. So we must mean that one of
    the two powers is actually wrong and the other actually right
  • But the moment you say that, you are putting into the universe a third
    thing in addition to the two Powers: some law or standard or rule of good
    which one of the powers conforms to and the other fails to conform to. But
    since the two powers are judged by this standard, then this standard, or the
    Being who made this standard, is farther back and higher up than either of
    them, and He will be the real God. In fact, what we meant by calling them
    good and bad turns out to be that one of them is in a right relation to the
    real ultimate God and the other in a wrong relation to Him.
  • The same point can be made in a different way. If Dualism is true, then
    the bad Power must be a being who likes badness for its own sake. But in
    reality we have no experience of anyone liking badness just because it is
    bad. The nearest we can get to it is in cruelty. But in real life people are
    cruel for one of two reasons- either because they are sadists, that is,
    because they have a sexual perversion which makes cruelty a cause of sensual
    pleasure to them, or else for the sake of something they are going to get
    out of it-money, or power, or safety. But pleasure, money, power, and safety
    are all, as far as they go, good things. The badness consists in pursuing
    them by the wrong method, or in the wrong way, or too much. I do not mean,
    of course, that the people who do this are not desperately wicked. I do mean
    that wickedness, when you examine it, turns out to be the pursuit of some
    good in the wrong way. You can be good for the mere sake of goodness: you
    cannot be bad for the mere sake of badness. You can do a kind action when
    you are not feeling kind and when it gives you no pleasure, simply because
    kindness is right; but no one ever did a cruel action simply because cruelty
    is wrong-only because cruelty was pleasant or useful to him. In other words
    badness cannot succeed even in being bad in the same way in which goodness
    is good. Goodness is, so to speak, itself: badness is only spoiled goodness.
    And there must be something good first before it can be spoiled. We called
    sadism a sexual perversion; but you must first have the idea of a normal
    sexuality before you can talk of its being perverted; and you can see which
    is the perversion, because you can explain the perverted from the normal,
    and cannot explain the normal from the perverted. It follows that this Bad
    Power, who is supposed to be on an equal footing with the Good Power, and to
    love badness in the same way as the Good Power loves goodness, is a mere
    bogy. In order to be bad he must have good things to want and then to pursue
    in the wrong way: he must have impulses which were originally good in order
    to be able to pervert them. But if he is bad he cannot supply himself either
    with good things to desire or with good impulses to pervert. He must be
    getting both from the Good Power. And if so, then he is not independent. He
    is part of the Good Power`s world: he was made either by the Good Power or
    by some power above them both.
  • Put it more simply still. To be bad, he must exist and have
    intelligence and will. But existence, intelligence and will are in
    themselves good. Therefore he must be getting them from the Good Power: even
    to be bad he must borrow or steal from his opponent. And do you now begin to
    see why Christianity has always said that the devil is a fallen angel? That
    is not a mere story for the children. It is a real recognition of the fact
    that evil is a parasite, not an original thing. The powers which enable evil
    to carry on are powers given it by goodness. All the things which enable a
    bad man to be effectively bad are in themselves good things-resolution,
    cleverness, good looks, existence itself. That is why Dualism, in a strict
    sense, will not work.
  • But I freely admit that real Christianity (as distinct from
    Christianity-and-water) goes much nearer to Dualism than people think. One
    of the things that surprised me when I first read the New Testament
    seriously was that it talked so much about a Dark Power in the universe-a
    mighty evil spirit who was held to be the Power behind death and disease,
    and sin. The difference is that Christianity thinks this Dark Power was
    created by God, and was good when he was created, and went wrong.
    Christianity agrees with Dualism that this universe is at war. But it does
    not think this is a war between independent powers. It thinks it is a civil
    war, a rebellion, and that we are living in a part of the universe occupied
    by the rebel.
  • Enemy-occupied territory-that is what this world is. Christianity is
    the story of how the rightful king has landed, you might say landed in
    disguise, and is calling us all to take part in a great campaign of
    sabotage. When you go to church you are really listening-in to the secret
    wireless from our friends: that is why the enemy is so anxious to prevent us
    from going. He does it by playing on our conceit and laziness and
    intellectual snobbery. I know someone will ask me, "Do you really mean, at
    this time of day, to reintroduce our old friend the devil-hoofs and horns
    and all?" Well, what the time of day has to do with it I do not know. And I
    am not particular about the hoofs and horns. But in other respects my answer
    is "Yes, I do." I do not claim to know anything about his personal
    appearance. If anybody really wants to know him better I would say to that
    person, "Don`t worry. If you really want to, you will Whether you`ll like it
    when you do is another question."


What Christians Believe I Broken families, broken Britain
Komentāri
Tavs komentārs

Komentārus var pievienot tikai reģistrēti lietotāji.


Iepazīšanās portāls oHo.lv
oHo.lv administrācija neatbild par iepazīšanās sludinājumu un pārējās portālā paustās informācijas saturu.
Apmeklējot oHo.lv Jūs apliecināt, ka esat iepazinušies ar oHo.lv lietošanas noteikumiem un apņematies tos ievērot.
© 2000.
oHo.lv izmanto sīkdatnes, lai darbotos un nodrošinātu Tev lielisku pieredzi.
Vairāk par sīkdatņu veidiem, to izmantošanu un konfigurēšanas iespējam lasiet šeit.
p.s. Mums arī nepatīk visi šie logi un paziņojumi, bet tāda nu ir kārtība 😅